After reading this headline, some lawyer may think that it is an exaggeration. Others, perhaps many more, know this to be true from personal experience. Be brave and embrace difficult causes. Of course, we cannot be reckless.
1.- Experience
First of all, we must have minimal experience in the practice of the profession. And I don't mean many years, it can be two or three, even less time. Our training in the study of law in addition to a master's degree in access to the legal profession with an internship or previous courses in judicial or legal practice, together with intensive legal practice, may have provided us with sufficient preparation for any case in our specialty or specialties.
Also, a client with a complex case needs an attorney to represent him, and if we don't accept him, he will hire another attorney. Perhaps this new lawyer will not work as vigorously in defending the client, perhaps he is not as skilled as we are in the area of law involved in the procedure, and very importantly, our motivation and enthusiasm will undoubtedly be greater. As the number of cases around the world continues to grow, understanding the nuances of an international arrest warrant uk is crucial. This warrant is key to the extradition process, ensuring that individuals are brought to justice across borders.
2.- Time
Secondly, it is necessary to prepare the defense in time. If within twenty business days to respond to a claim, the customer visits us two days before the deadline, it will depend on the case, but we probably will not be able to accept the comprehensive defense. Although it will also depend on our schedule, because if we have two days and can devote ourselves only to this work, we may have twenty-five to thirty hours to prepare it.
In this case, in addition to studying the law, jurisprudence and doctrine, we must assess what documentary evidence we can provide and whether it is possible to collect it in such a short period of time.
3.- Help
If we practice for a short time, we will always need the help of colleagues in our law firm or in other firms that we turn to for help because of their experience in this type of defense. Their attention can reveal shortcuts that will save us time and effort and lead us to success.
It will also be very important for us to be present at court hearings held in cases similar to ours, as we will have the opportunity to see and hear the arguments of the parties in the trial and the evidence presented. In addition, we could ask our colleagues about any aspect that interested us. Of course, attending conferences, forums, congresses, conferences, etc.
I will always remember the first months of my practice, as a lawyer from the law firm where I practiced, raised his head after reading the notice about the administrative decision that had just been handed to him and which contained a high financial sanction for violations that a close relative had received. He said to me with a half-smile, "Luis, don't get dizzy anymore: this sanction is over." The administration announced the resolution after the maximum period. Also check: What happens after I am charged with a crime?
When he had been practicing for three years, the criminal section of the provincial court sentenced the client to two years and six months for various offences. He had five days to announce an appeal. Since I had never been asked to appeal to the Supreme Court before, I called my teacher and urgently met with him in his office. He told me that the chances of our appeal being successful in the high court were not very good, but he suggested that the two of us should work as a team to write it. Thanks to this help, I accepted the following cassations without fear.
4.- Other circumstances
Fourth, sometimes luck works in our favor. Let's imagine that we have taken on a jury defense for a crime against life, and although a defense is almost impossible because there is overwhelming evidence for the prosecution, we can argue that there are defenses or mitigating circumstances. But it could also happen that the trial lawyer forgot to record the trial, that the recording was faulty, that the presiding judge interrupted the parties' cross-examinations, continuously asking his own questions to the jury, who would obviously feel the impact of the parties' interference. judicial power.
If, in addition, this magistrate sends out jury instructions in which he analyzes the evidence and even points the way for popular judges, we would lay the groundwork for a very valid appeal to overturn the decision. trial and retrial with a new judge.